Gambling regulation of federal states runs into heavy seas
June 12, 2012 by Dr Joerg Hofmann and Matthias Spitz, Melchers Law
Print this page Email this article“But in this world nothing can be said to be certain except death and taxes,” Benjamin Franklin once wrote in a letter to a good friend from France.
The responsible official of Saxony-Anhalt might have had this saying in mind when forging an alliance in the Federal Council of Germany, the representation of all federal states at federal level, against the federal state Schleswig-Holstein. Schleswig-Holstein has been resisting political pressure from the rest of the states to join their draft Interstate Treaty on Gambling, not agreeing with major restrictions to be imposed on the online gaming industry by this treaty.
Northernmost state Schleswig-Holstein upheld its “nein” (i.e. “no”) to the draft Interstate Treaty during the conference of all Prime Ministers of the federal states, held on December 15, 2011, in Berlin. At the end of last year, eastern state Saxony-Anhalt introduced a “bill on the taxation of sports betting” into the Federal Council, apparently aimed at torpedoing the more competitive tax regime of Schleswig-Holstein’s Gambling Act. In the event that the Federal Parliament adopts this bill, it can be said to be certain – to speak with Benjamin Franklin – that federal taxes on sports betting will supersede Schleswig-Holstein’s betting taxation.
European Commission could sink draft interstate treaty again
The draft Interstate Treaty finally agreed on during said conference in mid-December provides for a market opening in sports betting under a so-called “experimental clause” – although this opening would not be more than a door crack, given the limitation to a total number of 20 concessions for private operators.
Following the objections of the European Commission in their detailed opinion of July 18, 2011, intended taxation of sports betting was reduced from the initial 16.66 per cent on stakes to five per cent on stakes. However, such turnover-based taxation might not allow economically viable operations of online bookmakers, considering the low margins and tough competition in the market for online sports betting.
This report can be read in full in the Spring 2012 issue of European Gaming Lawyer
To read in full please subscribe to our publications.
What European operators need to know or do to enter the US market
European operators or suppliers need to know that a state-by-state process affords a myriad of opportunities to get a foothold in some part of the US online gaming entertainment market.
US faces the challenge of licensing affiliates
Besides search engines, e-mail and website syndication, marketing affiliates have long played an important role in driving customers to interactive gaming sites.
International Association of Gaming Regulators: Playing by the rules – a global perspective on gaming regulation
Internet gaming is continuing its spread around the world and with each jurisdiction that authorises it come new challenges for regulators to establish and the industry to comply with unique jurisdictional requirements.
Related articles
Our Publications
intergame
InterGame is the only monthly magazine covering the international coin-op amusements and gaming industry.
Learn moreintergaming
InterGaming is the leading monthly magazine covering the international land-based casino and gaming industry.
Learn moreintergamingi
Published bimonthly, iNTERGAMINGi is the leading publication for the growing international online gaming industry.
Learn moreYear Book
An extensive annual review of the industry covering all three gaming sectors and including a global directory of suppliers.
Learn moreEuropean Gaming Lawyer
A three-times-a-year publication produced on behalf of the International Masters of Gaming Law.
Learn moreCoin–op Community
Coin-op Community is an online marketplace where buyers meet sellers, produced in association with InterGame.
Learn moreOur Partners



